Image may be NSFW.
Clik here to view.
Clik here to view.
Cook’s 97% consensus study falsely classifies scientists’ papers according to...
UPDATE: More inconsistency: Cook survey included 10 of my 122 eligible papers. 5/10 were rated incorrectly. 4/5 were rated as endorse rather than neutral.— Richard Tol (@RichardTol) May 22, 2013...
View Article
Image may be NSFW.
Clik here to view.
Clik here to view.
Tol statistically deconstructs the 97% Consensus
Dr. Richard Tol has been tweeting a statistical destruction of the “97% consensus” study, Cook et al. (2013) by educating co-author Dana Nuccitelli as to why his “sample” is not representative. “In his...
View Article
Image may be NSFW.
Clik here to view.
Clik here to view.
The madness of 97% 98% consensus herds
UPDATE: comments welcome on Dr. Richard Tol’s draft paper on this issue, see below. This will be a top post for a day, new posts will appear below this one – Anthony “Men, it has been well said, think...
View Article
